昨天大學生了沒納豆說的內湖限量拉麵 - 台北內湖區

By Erin
at 2012-06-06T12:08

Table of Contents

→ AFJ:cost/performance ?那應該是越低越好，不知推文說的c/p是？ 05/30 17:29

推 AFJ:o.o 05/30 17:41

推 AFJ:profit指的是利潤、盈餘方面的好處，就算這種c/p值的應用 05/30 18:27

→ AFJ:一樣越低越好 05/30 18:27

→ AFJ:有人拿capacity來形容拉麵嗎？.... 05/30 18:27

→ AFJ:那恐怕是指容量有關了 05/30 18:28

→ AFJ:就算要大碗，味道一樣也重要啊，不然人家國外都用performance 05/30 18:29

→ AFJ:不就是為了兼顧各種消費得來的表現？ 05/30 18:29

→ AFJ:國外慣用的就是cost/performance，看到誤用就覺得很怪 05/30 18:30

你才整個誤會. cost/performance ratio事實上是performance/cost(price)
代表物品價位的效益比, c/p(c-p,p/p)只是一種慣用寫法, 本來就是越高越好.
自己根本不清楚還回一長串加上表情什麼的很讓人看不慣.

--
想糾正人前請多讀點書

--

Tags: 台北內湖

All Comments

By Oliver
at 2012-06-07T09:21

cost/performance ?那應該是越低越好，不知推文說的c/p是？

By Belly
at 2012-06-08T06:34

o.o

By Jacky
at 2012-06-09T03:47

profit指的是利潤、盈餘方面的好處，就算這種c/p值的應用一樣越低越好有人拿capacity來形容拉麵嗎？....

By Valerie
at 2012-06-10T01:00

那恐怕是指容量有關了

By Kristin
at 2012-06-10T22:12

就算要大碗，味道一樣也重要啊，不然人家國外都用performance不就是為了兼顧各種消費得來的表現？

By Edwina
at 2012-06-11T19:25

國外慣用的就是cost/performance，看到誤用就覺得很怪

By Doris
at 2012-06-12T16:38

原本還以為是在說想成capability/price的誤解結果根本是這人沒搞清楚

By Annie
at 2012-06-13T13:51

打臉文來了嗎話說他那表情也是種約定俗成的東西 XD

By Olga
at 2012-06-14T11:03

我是指看了窩火, 倒對他的用法沒什麼意見:p

By Quanna
at 2012-06-15T08:16

打臉了嗎XDDD

By Aaliyah
at 2012-06-16T05:29

打臉打真大力

By Suhail Hany
at 2012-06-17T02:42

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cost-performance_ratio

By Megan
at 2012-06-17T23:55

price/performance 謝謝

By Connor
at 2012-06-18T21:07

換成慣性使用，還是cost/performance都看得出來是越低越好

By Genevieve
at 2012-06-19T18:20

我怎覺得....我打臉打得很大力....

By Agnes
at 2012-06-20T15:33

看了推文再度回覆，我哪邊沒搞清楚=.=?

By Anonymous
at 2012-06-21T12:46

c/p本來就是越小越好，會有人用越大越好，就代表使用者的c/p可能是作成capability/price才會越大越好

By Zanna
at 2012-06-22T09:59

而拉麵不可能用capability來形容容量，連我委婉的在說

By Carolina Franco
at 2012-06-23T07:11

約定成俗你沒聽說過嗎? 自己只會打一堆莫名的表情符號

By Joseph
at 2012-06-24T04:24

"c/p越大越好是很奇怪的事情" 這樣這篇原po才能理解嗎？人家用法就是越小越好，小小台灣喜歡跟廣大用法不一樣聽得懂跟接受是兩回事

By Anonymous
at 2012-06-25T01:37

還想教訓別人北車就北車聽不懂跑到北京只能怪自己笨

By Ina
at 2012-06-25T22:50

你不接受也用不著教訓別人

By Ina
at 2012-06-26T20:02

╮(﹋﹏﹌)╭

By Adele
at 2012-06-27T17:15

台灣稱作『性價比』自然愈高愈好只是英文寫成CP

By Hamiltion
at 2012-06-28T14:28

真要講是 capability/price 沒錯且用在拉面上我不為有

By Kumar
at 2012-06-29T11:41

任何的不妥語言是活的戰別人用法的時候還只會打表情符號我只能說你真是傻子我隨便都可以把表情符號作其他解釋

By Steve
at 2012-06-30T08:54

A某你錯怪上一篇原po錯用cp值都沒見你陪失禮耶？

By Frederica
at 2012-07-01T06:06

不過我知道有些人說破嘴爭破頭都不會鬆口低 XD

By James
at 2012-07-02T03:19

確實是搞錯誰用錯就給人笑笑我搞錯人

By Isla
at 2012-07-03T00:32

但capability字義拿來用在拉麵，除非就是只看碗大小難吃死了也無所謂

By Michael
at 2012-07-03T21:45

這種用法還會比cost/performance來的適合？

By Suhail Hany
at 2012-07-04T18:58

用法本來就沒有所謂的絕對，但一比較下來，一看就知道哪種用法比較合適

By Kristin
at 2012-07-05T16:10

你自己拿出wiki連結卻連內容都不看嗎?Generally speaking, products with a higher price/performance ratio are more desirable自己拿資料砸腳是那齣?

By Charlotte
at 2012-07-06T13:23

做為一門學科學習語文, 我們可以說它有"正確"的構築模式, 所以不論撰寫正式文書或是在學習上, 嚴謹是應該被

By Yedda
at 2012-07-07T10:36

要求的.

By Margaret
at 2012-07-08T07:49

但所謂語言不過是種溝通工具. 傳達者和收受者能夠彼此

By Rae
at 2012-07-09T05:01

互通就夠了. 碰過語言學一開始就會講到洋涇濱語, 這東

By Una
at 2012-07-10T02:14

西從那一方的語文結構看來都慘不忍睹, 但它只是一種語

By Audriana
at 2012-07-10T23:27

言歸融產生的結果, 何來對錯之分?

By Ophelia
at 2012-07-11T20:40

在他人合樂溝通的時候去糾正文法, 難道都不會覺得非常失禮嗎?

By Linda
at 2012-07-12T17:53

每單位效用的成本...你不覺得這樣怪怪的嗎???當然是"每單位成本的效用"阿這樣的話不是越高越好

By Bethany
at 2012-07-13T15:05

北車不能用真的很好笑，地名路名重複在世界各地比比皆是

By William
at 2012-07-14T12:18

(Redirected from Cost-performance ratio)

By Audriana
at 2012-07-15T09:31

或許失禮，人家說不正確的使用方式不說，又待何時?

By Tristan Cohan
at 2012-07-16T06:44

每單位效用的成本，越低越好，不奇怪啊

By Faithe
at 2012-07-17T03:56

英文邏輯文法本來就跟中文有差異

By Charlie
at 2012-07-18T01:09

重點在於不是叫做每單位效用的成本而是每單位成本的效用

By Donna
at 2012-07-18T22:22

因為效用只能用來比較高低無法量化...

By Ula
at 2012-07-19T19:35

計較效用的同時，也不能忽略花費多少成本所以考量效用與成本，外文c/p就是越小越好

By Barb Cronin
at 2012-07-20T16:48

你知道效用有負的嗎? 所以你確定越低越好...

By Adele
at 2012-07-21T14:00

其實東西好吃就好> < 主題應該是吃的東西吧;w;

By Todd Johnson
at 2012-07-22T11:13

-.-，有人花了錢，完全沒有效用還反而更虧，試問有人會這麼做?

By Lauren
at 2012-07-23T08:26

噗，拉麵整個被忽視了xd

By Leila
at 2012-07-24T05:39

重點在於d大推文的末4行啊人家是討論拉麵你扯語言?

By Rosalind
at 2012-07-25T02:52

(呵欠

By Connor
at 2012-07-26T00:04

higher c/p are more desirable這話有多難理解?

By Olivia
at 2012-07-26T21:17

外文c/p口語一樣是講越高越好, 你有看過阿豆仔組PC

By Christine
at 2012-07-27T18:30

時會說希望在c/p表現上很低嗎

By Vanessa
at 2012-07-28T15:43

ok，我整個搞錯，跳梁小丑

By Carolina Franco
at 2012-07-29T12:55

竟然要拐這麼大一個彎才認錯, 不管真不真心都很歪歪

By Hamiltion
at 2012-07-30T10:08

也是不用說到這種程度...只是討論時請盡量節制糾正他

By Charlie
at 2012-07-31T07:21

人文法/誤用的欲望, 要是真的很想點醒對方請私下提醒

By Necoo
at 2012-08-01T04:34

Cost Performance Index =>CP值 =>越高越好...

By Poppy
at 2012-08-02T01:47

http://ppt.cc/ILN9

By Edith
at 2012-08-02T22:59

推darkfantasy:higher c/p are more desirable

By Anthony
at 2012-08-03T20:12

事實上就是繞了好大個彎才知道自己搞錯-.-

By Steve
at 2012-08-04T17:25

應該會讓你印象很深刻才對XD

By Freda
at 2012-08-05T14:38

噗，這倒是xd

By Rae
at 2012-08-06T11:50

wiki寫的是：higher price/performance ratio are moredesirable，和Price/performance is often written as"price-performance" or "cost-performance".

By Jessica
at 2012-08-07T09:03

不知道為何darkfantasy第1次寫對，第2次卻寫成higher c/pare more desirable？

By Thomas
at 2012-08-08T06:16

wiki整個解釋頁都沒有c/p或cost/performance的寫法。

By Valerie
at 2012-08-09T03:29

因為不簡化塞不進一行.

By Elizabeth
at 2012-08-10T00:42

而且c/p本來在台灣就已經是約定成俗的用法.

By Elizabeth
at 2012-08-10T21:54

我完全沒有任何p/p正確, c/p誤用的這種考慮

By Ethan
at 2012-08-11T19:07

也不認為有人會誤解我說的c/p不是wiki寫的p/p

By Linda
at 2012-08-12T16:20

AFJ還蠻好笑的多虧有人耐心教他

By William
at 2012-08-13T13:33

？說好的拉麵呢

By Catherine
at 2012-08-14T10:46

補推

By Daph Bay
at 2012-08-15T07:58

我笑了教的人辛苦了哈哈哈AFJ還蠻好笑的 +1

By Kama
at 2012-08-16T05:11

Orz...

By Hamiltion
at 2012-08-17T02:24

你們兩個在爭什麼? 霧沙沙

By Hedda
at 2012-08-17T23:37

沒關係我連拉麵都吃不起我吃泡麵去> <

By Joe
at 2012-08-18T20:49

樓上,現在泡麵貴到嚇人,買50元便當較實在...

By Rachel
at 2012-08-19T18:02

可惜我都吃$10左右的泡麵> <

By Caitlin
at 2012-08-20T15:15

純噓AFJ:小小台灣喜歡跟廣大用法不一樣等等推回

By Anonymous
at 2012-08-21T12:28

辛苦原PO了!有些人就是很愛不懂裝懂

昨天大學生了沒納豆說的內湖限量拉麵 - 台北內湖區

All Comments

Related Posts

熟成21牛肉麵

6/13 星期三 AM10:00 羽球團

內湖賣樂高的店

737巷微笑紅豆餅是否沒有在營業

環島用腳踏車馬鞍袋