整合寫作 - 英檢
By Emma
at 2011-02-10T01:20
at 2011-02-10T01:20
Table of Contents
想請問一下,整合寫作是寫的愈詳細愈好(300~350字,當然是以寫的完為前提)
還是一定要整理到大綱才會高分?
因為我看板上某大提供的滿分範例,作者都講的非常大綱...
幾乎是一點細節都沒提到
所以我在擔心,如果寫太詳細,只是換句話說或抽換字面,會不會反而被扣分!!
下面是其中一篇大綱版的例子:(如果po這個不適合請告知..我等等馬上刪)
TPO 5
The author of the reading passage proposes three theories as likely
explanations of the primary function of Chaco Canyon houses, grant structures
built in the I2th century. The lecturer, however, points to the inaccuracies
in each of these theories.
The lecturer argues that the modest number of fireplaces in these structures
is in contradiction with the huge size of these houses, indicating that these
structures could not have been used for Residential purposes. The Reading,
however, draws comparisons between the Chaco houses and other similar large
Residential structures in support of the "Residential" theory.
The second theory, that the houses were used for food storage, is also
rejected by the lecturer. He explains that a place that had been used for
storing maize would have many traces of scattered Maize, which is not the
case in the area of the Chaco Canyon houses. This proves that the "food
storage theory" is unlikely.
Finally, regarding the third theory, the "ceremony theory'', the lecturer
contends that the presence of broken pots close to the great houses does not
offer sufficient proof that this was a place for ceremonial activities.
He argues that there are other materials such as pieces of construction trash
found along with the broken pots, which suggest that these pots were probably
not used for ceremonial purposes but instead were discarded by construction
workers upon completion of the great houses.
--
還是一定要整理到大綱才會高分?
因為我看板上某大提供的滿分範例,作者都講的非常大綱...
幾乎是一點細節都沒提到
所以我在擔心,如果寫太詳細,只是換句話說或抽換字面,會不會反而被扣分!!
下面是其中一篇大綱版的例子:(如果po這個不適合請告知..我等等馬上刪)
TPO 5
The author of the reading passage proposes three theories as likely
explanations of the primary function of Chaco Canyon houses, grant structures
built in the I2th century. The lecturer, however, points to the inaccuracies
in each of these theories.
The lecturer argues that the modest number of fireplaces in these structures
is in contradiction with the huge size of these houses, indicating that these
structures could not have been used for Residential purposes. The Reading,
however, draws comparisons between the Chaco houses and other similar large
Residential structures in support of the "Residential" theory.
The second theory, that the houses were used for food storage, is also
rejected by the lecturer. He explains that a place that had been used for
storing maize would have many traces of scattered Maize, which is not the
case in the area of the Chaco Canyon houses. This proves that the "food
storage theory" is unlikely.
Finally, regarding the third theory, the "ceremony theory'', the lecturer
contends that the presence of broken pots close to the great houses does not
offer sufficient proof that this was a place for ceremonial activities.
He argues that there are other materials such as pieces of construction trash
found along with the broken pots, which suggest that these pots were probably
not used for ceremonial purposes but instead were discarded by construction
workers upon completion of the great houses.
--
Tags:
英檢
All Comments
By Tracy
at 2011-02-12T16:53
at 2011-02-12T16:53
By Christine
at 2011-02-17T10:39
at 2011-02-17T10:39
Related Posts
請問是否有倍特英語舊生願意當介紹人,可享贈送課程一堂
By James
at 2011-02-10T01:19
at 2011-02-10T01:19
關於複查
By Mason
at 2011-02-09T18:27
at 2011-02-09T18:27
請問有人在詠瑞家教上過托福課嗎?
By Agnes
at 2011-02-09T15:05
at 2011-02-09T15:05
請問網路公布成績
By Daph Bay
at 2011-02-09T12:02
at 2011-02-09T12:02
美加的實戰班(平日晨)
By Daph Bay
at 2011-02-09T10:44
at 2011-02-09T10:44