這篇lecture一開始就講了下面這段話,
Today, we're going to take a little detour; we're going to diverge from the
syllabus for a little while to talk about something that would normally come
a little later in the course.
而第一題問
What is true about the lecture the professor is giving?
A) It shouldn't have been a part of the course.
"shouldn't have been"代表不應該是但卻已經是, 但老師說 would normally come a
later in the course, 所以怎麼會是不應該是呢?
C) It should have been given later in the term.
"should have been"代表應該有卻沒有, 但老師說了would normally come a little
later in the course, 表示將來會教不是嗎? 所以怎麼會是應該有卻沒有呢?
我原選A但答案是C, 其實我現在看覺得A好想也怪怪的XD
可能我對文法有誤解 請知道的人解答一下~謝謝!
--
Today, we're going to take a little detour; we're going to diverge from the
syllabus for a little while to talk about something that would normally come
a little later in the course.
而第一題問
What is true about the lecture the professor is giving?
A) It shouldn't have been a part of the course.
"shouldn't have been"代表不應該是但卻已經是, 但老師說 would normally come a
later in the course, 所以怎麼會是不應該是呢?
C) It should have been given later in the term.
"should have been"代表應該有卻沒有, 但老師說了would normally come a little
later in the course, 表示將來會教不是嗎? 所以怎麼會是應該有卻沒有呢?
我原選A但答案是C, 其實我現在看覺得A好想也怪怪的XD
可能我對文法有誤解 請知道的人解答一下~謝謝!
--
All Comments