※ 引述《Diablotin (咕嚕咕嚕)》之銘言：
: Paragraph 1: Since 1980, the use of wind to produce electricity has been
: growing rapidly. █In 1994 there were nearly 20,000 wind turbines worldwide,
: most grouped in clusters called wind farms that collectively produced 3,000
: megawatts of electricity. █Most were in Denmark (which got 3 percent of
: its electricity from wind turbines) and California (where 17,000 machines
: produced 1 percent of the state’s electricity, enough to meet the
: residential needs of a city as large as San Francisco). █In principle,
: all the power needs of the United States could be provided by exploiting
: the wind potential of just three states—North Dakota, South Dakota,
: and Texas. █
: 13.
: 放入這句
: Some companies in the power industry are aware of this wider possibility
: and are planning sizable wind-farm projects in states other than California.
: 我覺得是3, 因為這句提到其他地方,下一句就指出哪些地方
: 可是解答是4
: 有沒有人可以幫我解釋一下這題？感謝回答呦！
※ 引述《Diablotin (咕嚕咕嚕)》之銘言：
: Paragraph 1: Since 1980, the use of wind to produce electricity has been
: growing rapidly. █In 1994 there were nearly 20,000 wind turbines worldwide,
: most grouped in clusters called wind farms that collectively produced 3,000
: megawatts of electricity. █Most were in Denmark (which got 3 percent of
: its electricity from wind turbines) and California (where 17,000 machines
: produced 1 percent of the state’s electricity, enough to meet the
: residential needs of a city as large as San Francisco). █In principle,
: all the power needs of the United States could be provided by exploiting
: the wind potential of just three states—North Dakota, South Dakota,
: and Texas. █
: 13.
: 放入這句
: Some companies in the power industry are aware of this wider possibility
: and are planning sizable wind-farm projects in states other than California.
: 我覺得是3, 因為這句提到其他地方,下一句就指出哪些地方
: 可是解答是4
: 有沒有人可以幫我解釋一下這題？感謝回答呦！
當初的討論在 #1AhxUe6T
不過那個解釋我自己也看不懂...(逃...)
所以參考一下我的說法吧
用中文來說
本文選項3之前的句子是
"風力發電在Denmark以及California目前的使用程度與效果"
選項3之後的句子就進一步的介紹
"理論上,全美國的電力可由North Dakota, South Dakota, and Texas提供
by exploiting the wind potential(物盡其用的分配這潛在的風力能源)"
因此!
一些在能源工業中的公司察覺到了這個可能性故而開始策劃wind-farm
projects在這些地方多於California
重點來了
1. 插入句中提到aware of this wider possibility
恰好呼應本文中的wind potential
2. 插入句中的 in states rather than California的 in states就是指
North Dakota, South Dakota, and Texas 這三州
所以當然要擺在最後囉:)
這樣了解了嗎?
--
: Paragraph 1: Since 1980, the use of wind to produce electricity has been
: growing rapidly. █In 1994 there were nearly 20,000 wind turbines worldwide,
: most grouped in clusters called wind farms that collectively produced 3,000
: megawatts of electricity. █Most were in Denmark (which got 3 percent of
: its electricity from wind turbines) and California (where 17,000 machines
: produced 1 percent of the state’s electricity, enough to meet the
: residential needs of a city as large as San Francisco). █In principle,
: all the power needs of the United States could be provided by exploiting
: the wind potential of just three states—North Dakota, South Dakota,
: and Texas. █
: 13.
: 放入這句
: Some companies in the power industry are aware of this wider possibility
: and are planning sizable wind-farm projects in states other than California.
: 我覺得是3, 因為這句提到其他地方,下一句就指出哪些地方
: 可是解答是4
: 有沒有人可以幫我解釋一下這題？感謝回答呦！
※ 引述《Diablotin (咕嚕咕嚕)》之銘言：
: Paragraph 1: Since 1980, the use of wind to produce electricity has been
: growing rapidly. █In 1994 there were nearly 20,000 wind turbines worldwide,
: most grouped in clusters called wind farms that collectively produced 3,000
: megawatts of electricity. █Most were in Denmark (which got 3 percent of
: its electricity from wind turbines) and California (where 17,000 machines
: produced 1 percent of the state’s electricity, enough to meet the
: residential needs of a city as large as San Francisco). █In principle,
: all the power needs of the United States could be provided by exploiting
: the wind potential of just three states—North Dakota, South Dakota,
: and Texas. █
: 13.
: 放入這句
: Some companies in the power industry are aware of this wider possibility
: and are planning sizable wind-farm projects in states other than California.
: 我覺得是3, 因為這句提到其他地方,下一句就指出哪些地方
: 可是解答是4
: 有沒有人可以幫我解釋一下這題？感謝回答呦！
當初的討論在 #1AhxUe6T
不過那個解釋我自己也看不懂...(逃...)
所以參考一下我的說法吧
用中文來說
本文選項3之前的句子是
"風力發電在Denmark以及California目前的使用程度與效果"
選項3之後的句子就進一步的介紹
"理論上,全美國的電力可由North Dakota, South Dakota, and Texas提供
by exploiting the wind potential(物盡其用的分配這潛在的風力能源)"
因此!
一些在能源工業中的公司察覺到了這個可能性故而開始策劃wind-farm
projects在這些地方多於California
重點來了
1. 插入句中提到aware of this wider possibility
恰好呼應本文中的wind potential
2. 插入句中的 in states rather than California的 in states就是指
North Dakota, South Dakota, and Texas 這三州
所以當然要擺在最後囉:)
這樣了解了嗎?
--
All Comments