高度數配hoya這類單非好還是雙非好? - 眼鏡

By Isla
at 2006-12-20T09:39
at 2006-12-20T09:39
Table of Contents
※ 引述《cys070 (cys070)》之銘言:
: 左眼1200 閃光300
: 右眼775 閃光300
: 想配hoya的鏡片~單非球面的適合嗎?
: 還是有其它推鑒
上面這位大大...您屬於高度數跟高度散光族群
本身你的散光很高...我還是比較建議你用非球面的鏡片比較好
我聽店家跟我介紹有提到說
非球面的鏡片比較可以讓散光的修補達到自然視覺效果
而且你的度數這麼高...我想幾乎都是特製片的範圍
HOYA 1.7 非球面 跟SEIKO 1.74 非球面 我想都可以推薦給您.....
不過我個人比較建議用SEIKO的...畢竟是全世界最薄的鏡片!
--
安全鏡片還是選日本貨比較好唷!尤其是正日本貨唷! ... 小建言︿( ̄︶ ̄)︿
--
: 左眼1200 閃光300
: 右眼775 閃光300
: 想配hoya的鏡片~單非球面的適合嗎?
: 還是有其它推鑒
上面這位大大...您屬於高度數跟高度散光族群
本身你的散光很高...我還是比較建議你用非球面的鏡片比較好
我聽店家跟我介紹有提到說
非球面的鏡片比較可以讓散光的修補達到自然視覺效果
而且你的度數這麼高...我想幾乎都是特製片的範圍
HOYA 1.7 非球面 跟SEIKO 1.74 非球面 我想都可以推薦給您.....
不過我個人比較建議用SEIKO的...畢竟是全世界最薄的鏡片!
--
安全鏡片還是選日本貨比較好唷!尤其是正日本貨唷! ... 小建言︿( ̄︶ ̄)︿
--
Tags:
眼鏡
All Comments

By Ingrid
at 2006-12-24T04:04
at 2006-12-24T04:04

By Christine
at 2006-12-25T15:17
at 2006-12-25T15:17

By Zenobia
at 2006-12-27T12:04
at 2006-12-27T12:04

By Rosalind
at 2006-12-29T15:14
at 2006-12-29T15:14

By William
at 2006-12-29T18:12
at 2006-12-29T18:12

By Olive
at 2007-01-02T05:29
at 2007-01-02T05:29

By Irma
at 2007-01-05T18:38
at 2007-01-05T18:38

By Mason
at 2007-01-06T14:01
at 2007-01-06T14:01

By Edward Lewis
at 2007-01-09T09:21
at 2007-01-09T09:21

By Liam
at 2007-01-10T13:23
at 2007-01-10T13:23

By Rachel
at 2007-01-13T18:58
at 2007-01-13T18:58

By Carol
at 2007-01-15T09:28
at 2007-01-15T09:28

By Enid
at 2007-01-19T22:54
at 2007-01-19T22:54

By Gary
at 2007-01-20T01:08
at 2007-01-20T01:08

By Steve
at 2007-01-21T10:23
at 2007-01-21T10:23

By Barb Cronin
at 2007-01-21T17:51
at 2007-01-21T17:51

By Doris
at 2007-01-23T23:12
at 2007-01-23T23:12

By Faithe
at 2007-01-27T01:53
at 2007-01-27T01:53

By Elvira
at 2007-01-28T04:34
at 2007-01-28T04:34

By Lily
at 2007-01-31T06:56
at 2007-01-31T06:56
Related Posts
度數與遠近的問題

By John
at 2006-12-20T00:25
at 2006-12-20T00:25
高度數配hoya這類單非好還是雙非好?

By Joe
at 2006-12-19T23:43
at 2006-12-19T23:43
台中店家有幫粗框鑲鼻墊的服務嗎?

By Aaliyah
at 2006-12-19T20:42
at 2006-12-19T20:42
負責的態度!!

By Barb Cronin
at 2006-12-19T14:02
at 2006-12-19T14:02
戴膠框眼鏡的怪現象

By Anonymous
at 2006-12-19T00:48
at 2006-12-19T00:48