高度數配 ic!berlin 或 Markus-T 適合嗎? - 眼鏡
By John
at 2008-04-14T17:08
at 2008-04-14T17:08
Table of Contents
目前約 900度
散光 125
今天去看Markus-T
高雄倬眼的老闆說度數太高Markus-T可以不用看了 Q_Q
推薦IC! berlin (定價14k左右 ->打完折約 11k) (價位比皇家高了一點點)
請問如果用 Hoya 1.7 + Markus-T
看起來會很糟嗎?
--
Tags:
眼鏡
All Comments
By Madame
at 2008-04-16T03:26
at 2008-04-16T03:26
By Quanna
at 2008-04-18T10:01
at 2008-04-18T10:01
By Sierra Rose
at 2008-04-21T02:58
at 2008-04-21T02:58
By Edward Lewis
at 2008-04-25T14:59
at 2008-04-25T14:59
By Sierra Rose
at 2008-04-28T13:01
at 2008-04-28T13:01
By Xanthe
at 2008-04-29T21:06
at 2008-04-29T21:06
By Suhail Hany
at 2008-05-02T22:25
at 2008-05-02T22:25
By Rachel
at 2008-05-06T17:25
at 2008-05-06T17:25
By Rae
at 2008-05-10T05:30
at 2008-05-10T05:30
By Irma
at 2008-05-13T22:51
at 2008-05-13T22:51
By Blanche
at 2008-05-18T19:54
at 2008-05-18T19:54
By Blanche
at 2008-05-23T19:45
at 2008-05-23T19:45
By Zanna
at 2008-05-27T07:59
at 2008-05-27T07:59
By Linda
at 2008-05-29T10:06
at 2008-05-29T10:06
By Kristin
at 2008-06-01T14:58
at 2008-06-01T14:58
By Bethany
at 2008-06-06T08:39
at 2008-06-06T08:39
By James
at 2008-06-09T10:32
at 2008-06-09T10:32
By Harry
at 2008-06-12T20:02
at 2008-06-12T20:02
By Carolina Franco
at 2008-06-16T11:49
at 2008-06-16T11:49
By Olga
at 2008-06-18T04:30
at 2008-06-18T04:30
By Kama
at 2008-06-18T11:23
at 2008-06-18T11:23
By Oliver
at 2008-06-20T08:04
at 2008-06-20T08:04
By Skylar DavisLinda
at 2008-06-21T05:11
at 2008-06-21T05:11
By Quanna
at 2008-06-21T06:22
at 2008-06-21T06:22
By Caitlin
at 2008-06-22T15:51
at 2008-06-22T15:51
By Tracy
at 2008-06-22T22:39
at 2008-06-22T22:39
By Yuri
at 2008-06-23T17:48
at 2008-06-23T17:48
By Delia
at 2008-06-26T23:24
at 2008-06-26T23:24
By Suhail Hany
at 2008-06-29T04:54
at 2008-06-29T04:54
Related Posts
鏡片可以看出來是哪一種嗎
By Jack
at 2008-04-14T16:22
at 2008-04-14T16:22
請問一個鏡片牌子的隱形標記
By Michael
at 2008-04-14T14:48
at 2008-04-14T14:48
阪紀和東方鏡片的問題
By Kama
at 2008-04-14T11:27
at 2008-04-14T11:27
請問hero日劇裡面的眼鏡
By Megan
at 2008-04-14T05:42
at 2008-04-14T05:42
板聚....
By Kristin
at 2008-04-14T00:18
at 2008-04-14T00:18