靉靆眼鏡 - 眼鏡
By Kelly
at 2007-05-04T14:58
at 2007-05-04T14:58
Table of Contents
店家住址: 北市長安東路2段189-1號
店家電話:0/-2772-7222
店家網頁:http://0rz.tw/482Eu 拍賣
鏡框品牌: masaki ic!berlin.........etc
鏡片品牌: Nikon 東方....etc
其他主力品牌: 仿手工一堆.....
承4703
主要是因我發現這陣子帶上新眼鏡會有嚴重視差
左眼度數不足....
masaki1059+Nikon1.56
Left: 近視 325 散光 175
Right: 近視 375 散光 075 此付眼鏡 P.D. 約 79 mm
79mm這個值是兩家診所以及光明分子Nick給我的
(感謝Nick教我怎麼看P.D.值)
我這兩天跑了兩家診所
驗了度數
我PO有點散瞳之後...隔天醫生所開出的處方簽好了(驗光試點散瞳隔天早上...睡飽起床就去)
單子上寫的是"眼鏡處方簽"
Left: 近視 300 散光 100
Right: 近視 300 散光 175 P.D.值為 69 mm
醫生檢查出我除了有結膜炎之外
也一併道出我有假性近視的問題
散瞳前的驗光左眼是400度.........其他我忘了...當晚醫生說了太多度數...這個最明顯
散瞳後驗光只有300度而已........印象中右眼散瞳後是是少了25度
依照cys070給我的建議(感謝)
拿了驗光單回店家
說明我的來意(廢話....來凹保固的就是啦)
他把驗光單拿去 眼鏡也拿去測了測
回來
我跟他講了一下最近的眼睛狀況.....4703篇裡描述的那樣
又跟他講醫生說瞳距差距太大 鏡片必須重配
店家給我的回應好大一堆(但隻口不提PD值嚴重錯誤)
我整理重點如下:
1.你的眼球在二月配鏡之後有嚴重落差...........非店家責任
2.鏡片過了一個月而且度數不一樣超過保固標準.........非店家責任
3.我靠北了PD值明明就不對..怎講.........eo4......再不是他責任我就翻桌了
他說當初你鏡片有重新調整(加寬)...所以瞳距會變是正常的
而眼球有適應能力....些許的瞳距差異是能容忍的
(OS:你媽...1cm的瞳距差你跟我說這樣OK....全世界都說不行...就你說可以)
說到這我也不想講了.........場面順時冷清了下來
他說了一句: 怎辦!? (OS:靠北.....你問我喔.....那我來幹嘛)
5秒過後他說了一句: "那....一人一半" (OS:e04....我怎能接受)
一副Nikon 1.56 $2500 要你再出一付新的錢你可能....OOXX
我出一半好了.....你只要$1200 (OS:eo4eo4....50塊是我賺到喔!!)
我也不想講了
我就說我再看看好了.......
離開店家~~~~~~~~(正式代表$2500飛了....eo4.......兩片2500的小塑膠真貴啊)
算了.....我認栽好了.........抱歉語氣有點衝
我只想問問大家
我去眼鏡行配眼鏡
驗光
驗出的光不準確.....是我的責任嗎....即便我有假性近視好了
然到這不該是店家所該具備的責任嗎
服務業不應該要有服務到底的精神
收了你配鏡的錢...就應該要幫你搞定這副眼鏡....讓你看得清楚嗎!?
問問大家
這一場店家消費者雙輸的局面
........我身為一個消費者
........."我有錯嗎..........!?"
難過下台一鞠躬.......
--
這兩天檢查
我發先之前在中天配的眼鏡更誇張
到了四百多度
差距更大.........Orz
除非你跟我之前一樣窮........不然還是不要去中天吧.....XD
--
Tags:
眼鏡
All Comments
By Sierra Rose
at 2007-05-07T04:11
at 2007-05-07T04:11
By Kumar
at 2007-05-08T16:12
at 2007-05-08T16:12
By Oscar
at 2007-05-10T06:51
at 2007-05-10T06:51
By Irma
at 2007-05-12T04:34
at 2007-05-12T04:34
By Adele
at 2007-05-15T09:05
at 2007-05-15T09:05
By Quanna
at 2007-05-17T03:07
at 2007-05-17T03:07
By Ida
at 2007-05-18T03:57
at 2007-05-18T03:57
By Erin
at 2007-05-19T10:05
at 2007-05-19T10:05
By Adele
at 2007-05-22T17:09
at 2007-05-22T17:09
By Dorothy
at 2007-05-26T13:40
at 2007-05-26T13:40
By Franklin
at 2007-05-27T16:10
at 2007-05-27T16:10
By Eartha
at 2007-05-29T22:53
at 2007-05-29T22:53
By Rae
at 2007-05-31T09:28
at 2007-05-31T09:28
By Ingrid
at 2007-06-02T15:20
at 2007-06-02T15:20
By Ingrid
at 2007-06-06T15:47
at 2007-06-06T15:47
By Kelly
at 2007-06-08T19:22
at 2007-06-08T19:22
By Hedda
at 2007-06-10T11:35
at 2007-06-10T11:35
By Frederic
at 2007-06-13T06:46
at 2007-06-13T06:46
By Kelly
at 2007-06-15T09:10
at 2007-06-15T09:10
By Ivy
at 2007-06-18T22:47
at 2007-06-18T22:47
By Harry
at 2007-06-23T00:38
at 2007-06-23T00:38
By Rachel
at 2007-06-25T20:47
at 2007-06-25T20:47
By Emily
at 2007-06-26T17:24
at 2007-06-26T17:24
By Kristin
at 2007-06-30T03:29
at 2007-06-30T03:29
By Joe
at 2007-07-03T23:48
at 2007-07-03T23:48
Related Posts
playboy的眼鏡
By Caitlin
at 2007-05-04T13:15
at 2007-05-04T13:15
oliverpeoples和paul smith
By Quanna
at 2007-05-04T11:55
at 2007-05-04T11:55
hoya 1.8與1.7 的重量與厚度
By Agatha
at 2007-05-04T10:28
at 2007-05-04T10:28
TAG和詩樂鏡框的選擇
By Delia
at 2007-05-04T09:16
at 2007-05-04T09:16
紫外線,光天化日下謀殺視力
By Victoria
at 2007-05-03T23:35
at 2007-05-03T23:35