很苦惱,我到底該不該做前導波? - 雷射眼睛
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79a39/79a39052dca737813687fab05739e119f81729d6" alt="Liam avatar"
By Liam
at 2006-08-18T20:07
at 2006-08-18T20:07
Table of Contents
今天去台中白佳欣做術前檢查,態度還頗不錯
環境明亮乾淨,而且檢查就如同大家所說像跑關一樣換來換去
最後的結果
左眼度數550 右眼度數650
左眼有50度散光 右眼沒有散光
右眼角膜567 左眼角膜573
淚腺分泌有些微的不足
講到最後,她跟我說說總共有分三種階級的手術
低階 中階 高階 後兩種都有前導波
不過價錢真的是三級跳
本來想說,我度數不算深,角膜也挺厚,散光很淺
應該不需要做到前導波吧
才想起還需要瞳孔的數據
一問之下 >.< 我的瞳孔是5.1,這樣是不是算大呢
爬了幾篇文,好像幾乎沒有人比我的更大了
所以我應該要做前導波比較好嗎?
有沒有人可以分享一下經驗~~~
--
Tags:
雷射眼睛
All Comments
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d8c6/2d8c63f76ae5e2be83685c6876a7cf065a0fa510" alt="Zora avatar"
By Zora
at 2006-08-23T13:13
at 2006-08-23T13:13
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30983/30983b2cad6c80f48a32baaad247221cc2176699" alt="Eartha avatar"
By Eartha
at 2006-08-27T21:43
at 2006-08-27T21:43
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/210d8/210d878ba6a409f9d00c1ff0bd3efebf83fc836a" alt="Skylar DavisLinda avatar"
By Skylar DavisLinda
at 2006-09-01T18:08
at 2006-09-01T18:08
Related Posts
請問 為什麼眼科醫生很多都戴眼鏡呢?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c536/4c536614cad6885caeb25694f88d5214c8a02812" alt="Charlie avatar"
By Charlie
at 2006-08-17T22:59
at 2006-08-17T22:59
請問 為什麼眼科醫生很多都戴眼鏡呢?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08490/08490df72a158959cd3d96ffcec049fd95ed66de" alt="Queena avatar"
By Queena
at 2006-08-17T21:42
at 2006-08-17T21:42
諾貝爾雷射近視手術心得
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5051e/5051ec0475dfe60fb98d92b1fc431209ceec998a" alt="Franklin avatar"
By Franklin
at 2006-08-17T20:57
at 2006-08-17T20:57
請問 為什麼眼科醫生很多都戴眼鏡呢?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e1426/e14269d8eeeed118738b9904828532dd1d4c0769" alt="Skylar Davis avatar"
By Skylar Davis
at 2006-08-17T16:11
at 2006-08-17T16:11
士林元群眼科
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99898/99898eb16edeb6c58e426fa2ad5bda46d23784d0" alt="Tom avatar"
By Tom
at 2006-08-17T15:15
at 2006-08-17T15:15