TPO 11 MINERALS AND PLANTS - 英檢

Table of Contents

Paragraph 6:
Only recently have investigators considered using these plants
to clean up soil and waste sites that have been contaminated by toxic levels
of heavy metals – an environmentally friendly approach known as
phytoremediation. This scenario begins with the planting of hyper
accumulating species in the target area, such as an abandoned mine or an
irrigation pond contaminated by runoff. Toxic minerals would first be
absorbed by roots but later relocated to the stem and leaves. A harvest of
the shoots would remove the toxic compounds off site to be burned or
composted to recover the metal for industrial uses. After several years of
cultivation and harvest, the site would be restored at a cost much lower than
the price of excavation and reburial, the standard practice for remediation
of contaminated soils. For examples, in field trials, the plant alpine
pennycress removed zinc and cadmium from soils near a zinc smelter, and
Indian mustard, native to Pakistan and India, has been effective in reducing
levels of selenium salts by 50 percent in contaminated soils.



11. It can be inferred from Paragraph6 that compared with standard practices
for remediation of contaminated soils, phytoremediation

1.does not allow for the use of the removed minerals for industrial purposes.
2.can be faster to implement
3.is equally friendly to the environment
4.is less suitable for soils that need to be used within a short period of
time.


答案是四, 想請問大家為什麼是四= =

他不是說"compare with standard practices for remediation" 可是文章沒有說

standard practices for remefiation 比較適合說@@

請大家解答摟 !!!謝謝~

--

All Comments

Enid avatarEnid2011-09-09
第九行,說需要花好幾年,所以傳統方法比較快但較貴
Quintina avatarQuintina2011-09-11
第四個選項是針對需要在短時間內被使用的土地
文章中的方法需要較長的時間
Suhail Hany avatarSuhail Hany2011-09-16
after several years of cultivation.....
Kristin avatarKristin2011-09-18
可是第四個選項不是比較級? less sutiable
Sandy avatarSandy2011-09-20
但文章沒有提到說 standard practices for re!!$%^
Yedda avatarYedda2011-09-22
花的時間比較少QQ
Robert avatarRobert2011-09-27
我的意思是 "相較於"不適合 這點判定不出來...?
Rachel avatarRachel2011-09-30
可不可以請兩位再解答QQ 我想我閱讀有危險了XD"
謝謝你們!!!
Edward Lewis avatarEdward Lewis2011-10-01
其實你看後面,他提到excavation, reburial這種處理方式
都是很快就可以進行完成的,所以雖然他沒有明確點出,但還
Emma avatarEmma2011-10-05
是可以推論出四。此外,用刪去法的話,第一個直接是錯的,
與內文不符,第二個關於實行時的速度,完全沒提到,故刪去
Erin avatarErin2011-10-09
,第三個文中只有說這個方式比較eco friendly,傳統方式
Eartha avatarEartha2011-10-10
沒說。而第四個,要"花數年"才能,當然是不適合用在短期就
要利用的土地上。
Sarah avatarSarah2011-10-14
樓上 超謝謝妳!!! 我覺得我可能思緒還不夠敏捷
也謝謝其他人!!! 是說今天寫十二回 第一篇 慣用手錯
Damian avatarDamian2011-10-16
爆多,我真的是剩1X天的人嗎QQ 只能硬上了口矣